Embodied Learning and Its Implication for Effective Learning

  • Eyide, Joy Eghonghon Department of Curriculum Studies and Instructional Technology, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Victor-Ishikaku, Eunice C. Department of Science Education, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
Keywords: Learning, Embodied, Implication, Effective Learning

Abstract

Embodied learning has gained considerable increase in this modern era due to its distinctive approach in assisting students. Embodied Learning is rooted in the relationship between body and mind in learning. It constitutes a contemporary pedagogical theory of learning, which emphasizes the use of the body in the educational practice. It is one of the most effective techniques that involves physical movements and interactivity. This emerging technique easily integrates human-computer interaction and learning sciences to provide a bit challenging experience but a great learning output. Simple movements are required during the technique in the teacher's lessons. It does not only improve students’ interest in learning but engages them in the most pleasing way. Several researches related to various areas of expertise highlight the usefulness and the necessity of the body itself as a learning tool. However, it is difficult for teachers to incorporate the concept of embodied learning in classrooms. The combination of tangible intelligent objects, wearable, motion-tracking, sensor technology, and interactive video can give an ultimate outcome of this learning approach. Given the significance of Embodied Learning to new teaching methods and approaches, this paper presents the nature of embodied learning, its features/principles, strategies for its application in the classroom, need for applying it and its implication to learning. It was concluded that embodied learning approach provides a meaningful learning experience for students. It was suggested among others that teachers should be trained on how to apply embodied learning in teaching different subjects in the classroom.

References

1. Abrahamson, D. (2013). Building educational activities for understanding: an elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), 1-16.
2. Abrahamson, D., Gutiérrez, J., Charoenying, T., Negrete, A., & Bumbacher, E. (2012). Fostering hooks and shifts: Tutorial tactics for guided mathematical discovery. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 17(1/2), 61–86.
3. Ayala, N.A.R., Mendivil, E.G., Salmas, P., & Rios, H. (2013). Kinesthetic learning applied to mathematics using kinect. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 131-135.
4. Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1997). Unleashing the power of perceptual change. Addison-Wesley Publications.
5. Dixon, M., & Senior, K. (2011). Appearing pedagogy: From embodied learning and teaching toembodied pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture and Society,19(3), 473-484.
6. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is. MIT Press.
7. Foglia, L., & Wison, R.A (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319-325.
8. Hyland, E. (2019). Embodied learning in vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education Training, 71(3), 449-463.
9. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2013). Νέα Μάθηση: ΒασικέςΑρχέςγια την ΕπιστήμητηςΕκπαίδευσης. Αθήνα: Κριτική.
10. Kosmas, P. (2018). Moving bodies to moving mind: A study on the use of motion-based games in special education. Tech Trend, 62(6), 594-601.
11. Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Research, 42(8), 445-452.
12. McClelland, P.H., & Stein, U. (2015). Improving school. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 83-100.
13. Núñez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 45–65.
14. Oakeshott, M. (2017). Learning and teaching. In R.S.Peters (Ed.), The concept of education. (pp. 156-176), Routledge & Kegan Paul Publishers.
15. Riopel, M., & Smyrnaiou, Z. (2016). New developments in science and technology education. Springer.
16. Segal, A. (2011). Do gestural interfaces promote thinking? Embodied interaction: Congruent gestures and direct touch promote performance in Math. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Columbia University.
17. Smyrnaiou, Z. G., & Kynigos, C. (2012). Interactive movement and talk in generating meanings from science. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 14(4), 17.
18. Trninic, D., & Abhrahamsom, D. (2013). Embodied interaction as designed mediation of conceptual performance. Martinovic.
19. Victor-Ishikaku, E. (2015). Teaching skills handbook for trainee-teachers (2nd edition). Crystal Publishers.
20. Wilcox, H. N. (2009). Embodied ways of knowing, pedagogies, and social justice: Inclusive science and beyond. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 104–121.
21. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 625-636.
22. Yakhlef, I. (2010). The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31(4), 409-430.
Published
2023-07-16
How to Cite
Eyide, Joy Eghonghon, & Victor-Ishikaku, Eunice C. (2023). Embodied Learning and Its Implication for Effective Learning. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(7), 83-94. Retrieved from https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/823
Section
Articles