Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the high-level skills needed to take on the challenges of the 21st century is the ability to think critically. One must choose the right pedagogical strategy in order to foster analytical thinking and help students grow. Students must therefore learn to construct their own bodies of knowledge, conduct their own research, foster an insatiable curiosity, engage in learning communities, present models, cultivate reflective thinking skills, and have meaningful discussions about topics relating not only to knowledge but also to practical abilities. The Contextual Learning approach is an instructional strategy that incorporates a learning component and a way to introduce material by employing a number of study strategies, which in turn encourages students to draw links among both their foreknowledge and the material they are being asked to learn, as well as to synthesize and analyze this material to form their own original understanding. The theoretical underpinnings of Contextual Learning (CL) are sketched out; the theories of Active Learning, Constructivism, and Making Connections are highlighted.

Keywords

Contextual Learning Critical Thinking Constructivism Active Learning Learner

Article Details

How to Cite
Florence Ebikiemo, J.-A., & Eunice C., V.-I. (2023). Contextual Learning Approach: A Tool for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills amongst Learners’. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(5), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GB2SR

References

  1. 1. Balaney, C. A. (2013). Assessment on student's science process skills: A student centered approach. International Journal of Education, 3(1), 52-60.
  2. 2. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. 3. Driscoll, M. P. (2010). Psychology of learning for instruction. Allyn & Bacon.
  4. 4. Fisher, A. (2019). Critical thinking: A conductor. Erland.
  5. 5. Hall, C., & Kidman, J. (2014). Teaching and learning: Mapping the contextual influences. International Education Journal, 5(3), 332-342.
  6. 6. Halpern, T. I. (2011). Contextual learning for practioners. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 6(4), 54-58.
  7. 7. Haynes, T., & Bailey, G. (2013). Are you and your basic business students asking the right questions? Business Education Forum, 57(3), 33–39.
  8. 8. Hemming, H. E. (2010). Encouraging critical thinking: But…what does that mean? Journal of Education, 35(2), 173-182.
  9. 9. Johnson, E. B. (2012). Contextual teaching and learning: Making teaching and learning activities exciting and meaningful. Mizan Learning Center.
  10. 10. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth's Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub., 2009.
  11. 11. Murphy, G. L. (2012). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
  12. 12. Shea, j. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179.
  13. 13. Smith, B. P. (2010). Instructional strategies in family and consumer sciences: Implementing the contextual teaching and learning pedagogical model. Journal of Family and Consumer Science Education, 28(1), 23-38.
  14. 14. Suryawati, E., Osman, K.., & Subahan, W. (2010). The effectiveness of rangka contextual teaching and learning on students problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 171-182.
  15. 15. Victor-Ishikaku, E. C. (2017). Strengthening education for value re-orientation in Nigeria through Information and Communication Technology. Knowledge Review: A multidisciplinary Journal. 36(2) 75 – 80.
  16. 16. Victor-Ishikaku, E. C. (2017). E-learning: Catalyst for Life Long Learning. International Journal of Academia. 4(1) 250 – 261.
  17. 17. Wishler, V. R. (2013). Contextual teaching and learning for practioner. Educational Journal, 6(4), 161-172.
  18. 18. Wittgenstein, L. (2011). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a revised English translation. Blackwell.
  19. 19. Zumdani, S. (2014). Inquiry based learning.