Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Medical Discourse in Anthropocentric Contexts
Keywords:
Context, culture, interaction, communication, medicine
Abstract
This article explores the lexical, cognitive and semantical significance of medical discourse—a high-stakes topic with clear applied relevance that is also rich ground for developing anthropological theory. Studying discourse and medicine together brings us to encounter culture as discursively constituted. As historically situated practices, forms of medical discourse play a role in cultural production and reproduction. Effective intervention in those processes requires insightful assessment of communicative practices in sociocultural contexts. This article reviews such practices and contexts.
References
1. Aleksandrova, O. V. (2014). Formation of the world view on the basis of the language lexical grammatical system learning. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 3, 19–27.
2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Metaphor and discourse. The theory of metaphor. Retrieved April 15, 2018
3. Briggs CL. 2005. Communicability, racial discourse, and disease. Annu. Rev. Anthropol.
4. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis, 4(2). University of Amsterdam.
5. Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 235–263.
6. Israilova M. Sayfullayeva L. Yuldasehva D. INTERPRETATION OF MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BASED ON GREEK- LATIN ROOT. Thematics journal of Social Sciences. Vol-8-Issue-1 2022.
7. Kleinman A, Benson P. 2006. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med. 3:1673–76
8. Lee S. 1999. Diagnosis postponed: Shenjing shuairuo and the transformation of psychiatry in post-Mao China. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 23:349–80
9. Mattingly C. 1998b. In search of the good: narrative reasoning in clinical practice. Med. Anthropol. Q. 12:273–97
10. Vishnyakova, O. D. (2017). Cognitive aspects of terminological units presentation in the medical dictionaries. In International congress on cognitive linguistics (pp. 740–744). Belgorod: BelGU.
2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Metaphor and discourse. The theory of metaphor. Retrieved April 15, 2018
3. Briggs CL. 2005. Communicability, racial discourse, and disease. Annu. Rev. Anthropol.
4. Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis, 4(2). University of Amsterdam.
5. Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 235–263.
6. Israilova M. Sayfullayeva L. Yuldasehva D. INTERPRETATION OF MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY BASED ON GREEK- LATIN ROOT. Thematics journal of Social Sciences. Vol-8-Issue-1 2022.
7. Kleinman A, Benson P. 2006. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med. 3:1673–76
8. Lee S. 1999. Diagnosis postponed: Shenjing shuairuo and the transformation of psychiatry in post-Mao China. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 23:349–80
9. Mattingly C. 1998b. In search of the good: narrative reasoning in clinical practice. Med. Anthropol. Q. 12:273–97
10. Vishnyakova, O. D. (2017). Cognitive aspects of terminological units presentation in the medical dictionaries. In International congress on cognitive linguistics (pp. 740–744). Belgorod: BelGU.
Published
2022-06-27
How to Cite
Nigmatullayevna, I. M., Sabitovna, S. L., & Abduhafizovna, G. saodat. (2022). Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Medical Discourse in Anthropocentric Contexts. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 3(6), 230-232. Retrieved from https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/363
Section
Articles
