The Compatibility of Cognitive Questions with Indicators in the Teacher's RPP in Physics Lessons in SMA

Sri Enzela R.  Biiya; Dewi Diana  Paramata; Ritin  Uloli

Sri Enzela R. Biiya Jl. Prince Hidayat, Gorontalo Regency 96182, Indonesia
Dewi Diana Paramata Jl. General Sudirman Gorontalo City 96128, Indonesia
Ritin Uloli Jl. General Sudirman Gorontalo City 96128, Indonesia

Keywords: Physics, Teacher's, Lessons

Abstract

This study aims to determine the suitability of cognitive items with indicators in teacher-made lesson plans on physics material based on the rules of writing questions. The research subject is a physics teacher at SMA Negeri 6 North Gorontalo. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach following the concept given by Miles, Huberman and Spradley with data collection techniques in the form of item documents with lesson plans and interviews. The validity test used triangulation technique. Based on the assessment of the suitability of the items with the indicators in the teacher-made lesson plans, it was found that for all multiple choice questions from questions number 1 to question number 6, it was said to be less appropriate because the questions only included several rules for writing multiple choice questions

References

1. Arifin, Z. 2016. Evaluation of Learning (Principles, Techniques, and Procedures), Eighth Printing, Jakarta: Rosda Karya.
2. Ministry of National Education. 2008. Guidelines for Writing Question Items. Jakarta: Directorate of High School Development
3. Djemari, M. 2008 Techniques for Preparation of Test and Non-Test Instruments, Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Prss
4. Hidayah, S. 2016. Analysis of Student Errors in Solving SPLDV Story Problems Based on Polya's Completion Steps. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Mathematics Education. Kanjuruhan University Malang.
5. Jahja, U. 1996. Upgrading Language of Educational Testing, Jakarta: Balitbang Dikbud
6. Nana S, 2014. Assessment of Teaching and Learning Outcomes, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
7. Sugiyono. 2010. Research Methods: Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA
8. Permendikbud Number 24 of 2016 concerning Core Competencies and Basic Competencies of the 2013 Curriculum in Primary and Secondary Education.
9. Poppy K, et al. 2009. Development of Learning Tools for Middle School Teachers. Jakarta: Center for Development and Empowerment of Science Education and Education Personnel (PPPPTK IPA).
10. Rosidah. 2003. Human Resource Management. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
11. Sahara, F. 2017. Analysis of the suitability of questions in the lesson plan (RPP) for class X Indonesian Indonesian teachers with basic competencies in the 2013 curriculum. http://www.researchgate.net. (Downloaded January 26, 2019)