Social Ecological Samples of Quality of Life

  • Kim Larisa Antonovna Senior lecturer of the department, social-humanitarian sciences and physical education of the Almalyk branch of the Tashkent Technical University, Republic of Uzbekistan
Keywords: environmental problems, quality of life, environment, risk society, environmental paradigm

Abstract

The close intertwining of problems of environmental factors and the quality of life of the population makes it necessary to study the features of their interaction, identify patterns, and possible ways to optimize this interaction. The article substantiates the dominant influence of environmental factors on the modern model of quality of life. Theoretical approaches to understanding the quality of people's lives from a sociological point of view are considered. The features of the concept of perceived quality of life, structural-functional and socio-economic approaches to its assessment are revealed. A review of existing methods is proposed in order to systematize approaches to assessing the quality of life of the population presented in the scientific literature. It is shown that along with changes in the needs and living conditions of people, approaches related to the substantiation of various components of quality of life and their assessment are also evolving.

References

1. Abbey A. and Andrews F. Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality. Social Indicators Research, 1985, vol. 16.
2. Beck, U. Risk Society. on the way to another modernity / W. Beck; lane with him. V. Sedelnik and N. Fedorova; afterword A. Filippova. – M.: Progress-Tradition, 2000. – 384 p.
3. Beck, W. What is globalization? / W. Beck. – M.: Progress-Tradition, 2001. – 304 p.
4. Velikaya N. M., Novozhenina O. P. Environmental threats as a factor in the greening of public consciousness // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2022. T. 15. No. 4. pp. 209–227. DOI:10.15838/esc.2022.4.82.13.
5. Galbraith, D.K. life in our time / D.K. Galbraith; lane from English o.s. Vasilyeva; total ed. and preface dr. econ. Sciences S.M. Menshikov. – M.: Progress, 1986. – 150 p.
6. Taking care of the future: report of the independent commission on problems of population and quality of life / trans. from English – Moscow: publishing house “The Whole World”, 1998. – 334 p.
7. Leo WJeffers and Jen Dobos. Communication and Public Perceptions of the Quality of Life/ In: New Dimensions in Marketing/ Life-of-Life Research. Ed. by M.Josef Sirgy and A.Coskun Samli. Quorum Books. Connecticut London, 1995.
8. Markovich, D.Zh. Social ecology and quality of life: lecture notes / Zh. D. Markovich; Intl. independent ecologist-polit. univ. – Moscow: publishing house MnEPU, 1998. – 68 p.
9. Power T.W. The Economic Value of the Quality of Life. Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1980.
10. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan On approval of the concept of environmental protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030” dated October 30, 2019 No. UP-5863 (National Legislation Database, October 31, 2019, No. 06/19/5863/3979;
11. Yanitsky O.N. Russia as an ecosystem.// Sociological research. - 2005. - No. 7 (255). -P.84-94.)
Published
2024-01-29
How to Cite
Kim Larisa Antonovna. (2024). Social Ecological Samples of Quality of Life. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 5(1), 158-164. Retrieved from https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/1051
Section
Articles