Main Article Content

Abstract

This article provides windows into the constitutional guarantee of the right to petition in example of Central Asian republics. The authors rely heavily on primary sources such as constitutions and laws in force. The article draws together a significant body of theoretical and practical writing, providing insight into the key questions being raised by scholars in the field. It delves into the details of constitutional guarantee and summarizes and highlights the main differences and similar situations in the constitutions of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. In particular, based on the comparative textual analysis of the constitutions and the legal practice related to the realization of the right to petition, preliminary scientific and practical conclusions are drawn, the main peculiarities are outlined.

Keywords

human rights constitution right of petition application proposal complaint

Article Details

How to Cite
Khaydarali Yunusov, & Hazar Leylanoğlu. (2024). Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Petition in the Basic Laws of the Central Asian Republics. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 5(1), 102-110. Retrieved from https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/1046

References

  1. 1. Zabunoğlu, Hamdi Gökçe. (2012). Siyasal Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Kapsamı ve Sınırları. Basılmış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kamu Hukuku (Genel Kamu Hukuku) Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, 153.
  2. 2. Taşkın, Ş. Cankat. (2012). “Bilgi Edinme ve Dilekçe Hakkı”. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Kazancı Hukuk Dergisi, 8(99-100), 174-175.
  3. 3. Eroğul, Cem. (1999). Devlet Yönetimine Katılma Hakkı, 2. Baskı, Ankara, İmge Yayınları, 86.
  4. 4. Güner Yaşar, Gizem. (2023). “Anayasal Bir Hak Olarak Dilekçe Hakkının Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 792.
  5. 5. Anayurt, Ömer. (2001). “1982 Anayasası ve 3071 Sayılı Kanuna Göre Dilekçe Hakkı”. İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, 23-24, 98.
  6. 6. Yunusov, K., Olimjon SOBIR (2014). The Development of Legal Systems of Central Asian States. Studii Europene, (2), 23-34.
  7. 7. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1017178; Конституция Республики Казахстан (с изменениями и дополнениями): https://constitution.kz/razdel2/
  8. 8. The Constitution of the Republic of Tajikistan: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Tajikistan_2016; Конституция Республики Таджикистан (в редакции референдума от 26.09.1999г., от 22.06.2003 г., от 22.05.2016г.): https://mfa.tj/ru/main/tadzhikistan/konstitutsiya
  9. 9. Конституция Туркменистана (новая редакция) (с изменениями и дополнениями по состоянию на 21.01.2023 г.): https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=31337929#pos=6;-142
  10. 10. Law of the Kyrgyz Republic. Bishkek, 5 May 2021, No. 59 On the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/The%20Kyrgyz%20Republic%E2%80%99s%20;
  11. 11. The Renewed Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan adopted by referendum of 30.04.2023 enforced as of 01.05.2023: https://lex.uz/docs/6451070
  12. 12. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan of 1992: https://lex.uz/docs/20596
  13. 13. Law on Petition of Physical Bodies and Legal Entities of 2017: https://lex.uz/docs/3336169
  14. 14. Khaydarali Yunusov. (2023). THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL-LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE RIGHT TO PETITION (CASE OF UZBEKISTAN). The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 5(06), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume05Issue06-05
  15. 15. Yunusov, K., Ok, V., & Ochildiyev, H. (2008). The roles and responsibilities of transnational corporations with regard to Human Rights. Cuadernos constitucionales de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol, (64), 187-204.
  16. 16. Yunusov, K. (2023). Constitutional Bases of the Right to Petition: Case of Central Asian States. CENTRAL ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HISTORY, 4(12), 105-112. Retrieved from https://cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/991
  17. 17. Nazirov, M. (2021). O‘zbekistondagi siyosiy o‘zgarishlarning Markaziy Osiyoning barqaror rivojlanishiga ta’siri. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 1(11), 233-243.
  18. 18. Yunusov, K. (2023). O‘ZBEKISTON TASHQI SIYOSATINING KONSTITUTSIYAVIY ASOSLARI. Talqin Va Tadqiqotlar, 1(36). извлечено от https://talqinvatadqiqotlar.uz/index.php/tvt/article/view/1581
  19. 19. Karimov, F. E. (2022). CONCEPTUAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO SOLVING ETHNIC PROBLEMS. Journal of Social Research in Uzbekistan, 2(05), 20-28.